Hat tip to Common Cents.
Showing posts with label Deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deficit. Show all posts
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Monday, September 24, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
If He Were a Republican, This Would Make Him An Idiot
Via Gateway Pundit: "Obama Pulls a Biden, Tells Audience, 'Three Proud Words – Made in the USA!'"
Of course, Obama's never been very good with math.
Plus: Obama's supermarket scanner moment?
Of course, Obama's never been very good with math.
Plus: Obama's supermarket scanner moment?
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Democratic Grandee Explains What the Obstacle Was For the Simpson-Bowles Plan
Spoiler alert: Obama (Not Ryan or the Republicans).
Monday, August 6, 2012
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Olympics - Starring Kristi Yamaguchi and other Olympic Stars
Key takeaway: "He faced a $400 million budget deficit and turned it around to $100 million surplus."
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Friday, June 15, 2012
Friday, May 25, 2012
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Is Obama a Big Spender?
Obama and his media surrogates are now trying to claim that he is not. James Pethokoukis (and reality) lays waste to this argument.
More here.
More here.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
In a Bold Move
Obama adopts a position on gay marriage that Dick Cheney articulated twelve years ago. Gay marriage, birth control, dogs . . . . It seems Obama is willing to talk about anything as long as it's not the economy. I wonder why?
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Broken Promises: Campaigning To Cut Spending
It's so easy to forget, but:
As a candidate, Obama claimed that one cause of the economic crisis was the large deficits the country was running, and he promised that he would fix things by cutting government spending. During the third presidential debate, just over two weeks before the election, Obama promised to rein in the budget deficit.
When debate moderator Bob Schieffer asked Obama what he was going to do about the deficit, Obama promised to cut it: “But there is no doubt that we’ve been living beyond our means and we’re going to have to make some adjustments. Now, what I’ve done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut.”
Or take Obama’s promise in the second presidential debate: “Actually, I’m cutting more than I’m spending so that it will be a net spending cut.” Obama ran to the right of McCain, who Obama claimed was the candidate who was going to increase spending.
So what did we get? Obama racked up the largest inflation-adjusted increases ever in government spending and the largest deficits (even larger than those the U.S. ran in the worst part of World War II), and it is hard to remember that his constant theme during the presidential debates was “net spending cut.”Having racked up those deficits (and endangering our national defense), some might question Obama's patriotism.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
The Buffett Rule
It is no secret that Obama has failed to put forth a credible solution to the nation's debt crisis. One of the few solutions he has proposed is the so-called Buffett Rule. Well, the numbers are in: the Buffett Rule would raise an additional $47 billion over the next 11years, compared to the $47,913 trillion the Congressional Budget Office now projects in federal spending during that time.

Of course, the Buffett Rule was never really about raising revenue. It was about scapegoating and villifying the wealthy. The reality is that the US already has the most progressive tax system in the world. And even if you taxed 100% of the income of those millionaires and billionaires, it still wouldn't close the budget gaps. Actually paying for Obama's spending would necessarily involve massive, crippling middle class tax hikes. But he doesn't want to do that, at least not until after his re-election.
Of course, the Buffett Rule was never really about raising revenue. It was about scapegoating and villifying the wealthy. The reality is that the US already has the most progressive tax system in the world. And even if you taxed 100% of the income of those millionaires and billionaires, it still wouldn't close the budget gaps. Actually paying for Obama's spending would necessarily involve massive, crippling middle class tax hikes. But he doesn't want to do that, at least not until after his re-election.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
It's Official
In just three years and two months, Obama has increased the national debt more than Bush did in eight years. And here is some more food for thought: If Mr. Obama wins re-election, and his budget projections prove accurate, the National Debt will top $20 trillion in 2016, the final year of his second term. That would mean the Debt increased by 87 percent, or $9.34 trillion, during his two terms.
Hat tip to Instapundit.
Hat tip to Instapundit.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Flashback: Obama Calls Bush Unpatriotic
Correct me if I am wrong, but, by his own metric, I believe Obama would be the most unpatriotic president in history. $5 trillion in 3 years . . . and counting.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Government Records its Worst Monthly Deficit in History
The federal government recorded its worst monthly deficit in history in February, according to a preliminary report Wednesday from the Congressional Budget Office that said the deficit in fiscal year 2012 is already more than half a trillion dollars.
The CBO’s figures show that despite repeated efforts to trim spending, the government has borrowed 42 cents of every dollar it spent during the first five months of this fiscal year.
The nonpartisan agency projected the government will run a deficit of $229 billion in February, the highest monthly figure ever. The previous high was $223 billion a year ago, in February 2011.
It is the 41st straight month the government has run a deficit — itself a record streak that dates back to the final months of President George W. Bush’s tenure. Before now, the longest streak on record was 11 months.For all the money that they are burning, you would think that we would at least have something to show for it, but unemployment is still over 9%.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)